Dallas City Council votes to eliminate decades-old police staffing law requiring three officers per 1,000 residents
Dallas, Texas – Aiming at preventing possible legal challenges, the Dallas City Council recently deleted a long-standing legislation requiring particular police personnel levels across the city. Adopted in 1988, the regulation required a three police officers for every 1,000-resident ratio. The council’s decision to reject this staffing level sparked debate with opinions expressed both in support of and against the reversal. The vote took place during a two-hour executive session when council members debated the ramifications of either maintaining or eliminating the staffing need. Councilman Jesse Moreno and Mayor Eric Johnson objected, so the repeal passed with an 8-2 vote. Five council members missed the vote, which added another level of conflict to the proceedings.
Recent amendments to the Dallas city charter follow the decision to remove the ordinance. Voters adopted more than a dozen revisions to the charter just last week; two of them were suggested by the Dallas HERO charity. Securing enough petition signatures to carry the changes, the group was able to pass laws granting Dallas citizens new legal rights. More specifically, residents can now legally challenge the city both state laws and its own ordinances, including the 1988 police manning mandate, should the city fail to comply. Dallas HERO wanted the city to adhere to its standards since it’s believed that consistent police department staffing levels are essential for maintaining public safety.
Some predict Dallas might have faced immediate lawsuits over its failure to satisfy the 1988 staffing criteria with this newly acquired right to sue the city. The Dallas Police Department does not now have enough personnel to meet the ordinance’s criteria, hence meeting this ratio would mean major recruiting and budget allocations the city might not be able to meet in the near term. The council’s decision to remove the norm reflects both this technical difficulty and an attempt to minimize expensive legal battles resulting from residents claiming their rights under the new charter provisions.
Pete Marocco, Dallas HERO Executive Director, did not hold back when disparaging the council’s decision. Marocco called the repeal “reckless and spiteful,” charging the council of neglecting Dallas citizens’ expressed will.
“Once again, the city council has abused executive session instead of deliberating an important subject before the people, but the people still prevailed in the right to sue for violations of the law,” he stated, emphasizing his belief that the council’s actions reflect a disregard for public opinion.
Marocco further denounced the timing and behavior of the vote, claiming that the topic was included on the agenda under dubious conditions and that the lack of five council members further compromised the validity of the decision. He said the council’s choice puts political goals ahead of public safety and transparency.
Read also: Dallas developer pleads guilty to bribery scheme involving city officials
But for the city council, the choice probably shows a realistic attitude to local administration. Maintaining the 1988 personnel mandate would mean either a significant recruitment expenditure or a legal entanglement risk from non-compliance. City officials now must balance appropriate workforce and financial restrictions with public safety requirements. Some council members feel that rather than following a decades-old formula that might no longer reflect Dallas’s present needs, eliminating the staffing threshold gives them greater freedom in distributing resources.
Read also: Houston man sentenced to six years in prison for leading Medicaid kickback scheme at dental clinic
Although the repeal ends the legal obligation for three policemen per 1,000 citizens, concerns remain regarding how the city can guarantee sufficient police manpower going forward. The discussion has highlighted the conflict between Dallas HERO’s support of public responsibility and the city council’s attempts to make best use of few resources. Whether this choice eventually helps or compromises public safety in Dallas will probably be a topic of ongoing discussion among Dallas officials, activists, and citizens.
